Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Melville |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
16 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sara Twaddle |
10 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim |
28 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Melville |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim |
9 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sara Twaddle |
16 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Melville |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
17 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Craig Melville |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
17 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
19 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
11 May 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-42 |
You can find further information about peer review here.