Table 1 |
|||
|
Components to be assessed in the study |
|||
|
Component |
Definition |
Data collection |
Study objective |
|
|
|||
|
Context |
Environment/setting where CPG/CP is occurring |
-ACT survey -Pre/Post focus group data |
1c |
|
|
|||
|
CPG/CP attributes |
Features of the CPG and CP |
-Post focus group data |
1c |
|
|
|||
|
Reach (of KT interventions) |
Proportion of professionals that participates in each KT intervention. |
-Education session attendance -Local champion interviews |
1b |
|
|
|||
|
Dose delivered (of KT interventions) |
Amount of intervention delivered |
-Intervention provider interviews |
1b |
|
|
|||
|
Dose received (of KT interventions) |
Extent participants engaged with the KT interventions |
-Post-focus group data -KT intervention records |
1a |
|
|
|||
|
Fidelity (of the KT interventions) |
Extent to which the interventions were delivered as planned |
-Intervention provider interviews -KT intervention records |
1b |
|
|
|||
|
Implementation of the CPG/CP |
Extent to which the intervention has been implemented and received |
-CPG/CP use survey scores -Outcome data on CPG/CP use |
1c |
|
|
|||
|
Scott et al. Implementation Science 2011 6:133 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-133 |
|||
