Systematic review
What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review
-
* Corresponding author: Melissa C Brouwers mbrouwer@mcmaster.ca
1 Program in Evidence-based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
2 Departments of Oncology and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
3 Hamilton Urban Core Community Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
4 Department of Family and Community Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
5 Population Studies and Surveillance, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
6 School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
7 Department of Family Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
8 Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
9 Primary Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
10 Prevention and Screening, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
11 Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services - Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention and Screening, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
12 Department of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
13 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
14 Regional Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Network Hamilton, Niagara, Haldimand, Brant, Ontario, Canada
15 Systemic, Supportive and Regional Cancer Programs, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
16 Faculty of Information and Media Studies, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Implementation Science 2011, 6:111 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-111
Published: 29 September 2011Additional files
Additional file 1:
Members of Cancer Screening Uptake Expert Panel.
Format: DOC Size: 53KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 2:
Literature Search Strategies. Literature search strategies for the update are provided for Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO.
Format: DOC Size: 73KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 3:
AMSTAR assessment of included systematic reviews. Quality appraisal of the original evidentiary base (systematic reviews) using the AMSTAR tool.
Format: DOC Size: 36KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 4:
Formulae for the calculation of percent point (PP) change. Formulas utilized in percent point change calculations are dependent on the measurements provided in each study.
Format: DOC Size: 44KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 5:
Study quality characteristics of included randomized controlled trials for client reminder interventions. All studies are related to client reminders since no trials were obtained for client incentive interventions. Information on publication status, funding, randomization method, baseline, characteristics, blinding, statistical power, target sample size, follow-up period and intention to treat analysis are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 91KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 6:
Randomized controlled trial results: Client Reminders. All studies are related to client reminders since no trials were obtained for client incentive interventions. Information on participant criteria, study group numbers, intervention descriptions, reporting, and results are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 114KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 7:
Study quality characteristics of included randomized controlled trials for small media interventions. All studies are related to small media since no trials were obtained for mass media interventions. Information on publication status, funding, randomization method, baseline, characteristics, blinding, statistical power, target sample size, follow-up period and intention to treat analysis are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 99KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 8:
Randomized controlled trial results: Small Media. All studies are related to small media since no trials were obtained for mass media interventions. Information on participant criteria, study group numbers, intervention descriptions, reporting, and results are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 138KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 9:
Study quality characteristics of included randomized controlled trials for group education and one-on-one education. Information on publication status, funding, randomization method, baseline, characteristics, blinding, statistical power, target sample size, follow-up period and intention to treat analysis are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 91KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 10:
Randomized controlled trial results: Group Education and One-On-One Education. Information on participant criteria, study group numbers, intervention descriptions, reporting, and results are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 129KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 11:
Study quality characteristics of included randomized controlled trials for reducing structural barriers and out-of-pocket expenses. Information on publication status, funding, randomization method, baseline, characteristics, blinding, statistical power, target sample size, follow-up period and intention to treat analysis are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 62KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 12:
Randomized controlled trial results: Reducing Structural Barriers and Out-of-Pocket Expenses. Information on participant criteria, study group numbers, intervention descriptions, reporting, and results are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 68KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 13:
Study quality characteristics of included randomized controlled trials for interventions directed at providers. All studies are related to provider assessment/feedback since no trials were obtained for provider incentive interventions. Information on publication status, funding, randomization method, baseline, characteristics, blinding, statistical power, target sample size, follow-up period and intention to treat analysis are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 61KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 14:
Randomized controlled trial results: Interventions Directed at Providers. All studies are related to provider assessment/feedback since no trials were obtained for provider incentive interventions. Information on participant criteria, study group numbers, intervention descriptions, reporting, and results are provided.
Format: DOC Size: 74KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer