Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mathieu Ouimet |
23 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bridie Kent |
25 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
25 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bridie Kent |
29 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
7 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
7 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
12 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-106 |
You can find further information about peer review here.