Table 1 |
|
|
A comparison of the characteristics of scoping and systematic reviews. |
|
|
Systematic Review |
Scoping Review |
|
|
|
|
Focused research question with narrow parameters |
Research question(s) often broad |
|
|
|
|
Inclusion/exclusion usually defined at outset |
Inclusion/exclusion can be developed post hoc |
|
|
|
|
Quality filters often applied |
Quality not an initial priority |
|
|
|
|
Detailed data extraction |
May or may not involve data extraction |
|
|
|
|
Quantitative synthesis often performed |
Synthesis more qualitative, and typically not quantitative |
|
|
|
|
Formally assesses the quality of studies and generates a conclusion relating to the focused research question |
Used to identify parameters and gaps in a body of literature |
|
|
|
|
Brien et al. Implementation Science 2010 5:2 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-2 |
|