Table 1 |
|||
|
Summary of research design by content domain |
|||
|
Electronic communication of abnormal diagnostic test results |
Electronic referral requests |
Provider-to-pharmacy communication via CPOE |
|
|
|
|||
|
Task Analysis |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Sample |
Primary care providers (50% timely and 50% untimely follow-up) |
Specialists from five clinics |
Primary care providers (50% high and 50% low prescription error) |
|
|
|||
|
Procedure |
Task-based interviews on current knowledge and use of CPRS alert management features |
Cognitive walkthrough of consult process at each specialty |
Think aloud exercise of commonly miss-entered prescriptions |
|
|
|||
|
Analysis |
Content analysis of alert management schedules, knowledge of alert management features, and use of workarounds |
Process map of consult process at each specialty; corroboration against independent primary care task database |
Content analysis of think aloud transcripts for correctness of prescription entry and specific strategies used |
|
|
|||
|
Focus Groups |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Sample |
Primary care, laboratory, and IT personnel |
Primary care providers, specialists, and IT personnel |
Primary care providers, IT personnel, and pharmacists |
|
|
|||
|
Procedure |
Three focus groups: Providers with timely follow-up (fresh data collection), Providers with untimely follow-up (fresh data collection) Mix of providers with timely and untimely follow-up (member checking and corroboration) |
Four focus groups: Primary care providers (fresh data collection) Specialists (fresh data collection) Primary care providers (member checking and corroboration) Specialists (member checking and corroboration) |
Three focus groups of pharmacists and: Providers with high prescription conflict errors (fresh data collection), Providers with low prescription conflict errors(fresh data collection) Mix of providers (member checking and corroboration) |
|
|
|||
|
Analysis |
Grounded theory analysis of focus group transcripts; inductive coding taxonomy development via single sequence of coding, validation, and consensus; taxonomy fitted to SEIPSa model and used for open, axial, and selective coding |
Grounded theory analysis of focus group transcripts; inductive coding taxonomy development via iterative process of coding, validation, and consensus; taxonomy fitted to SEIPS model and used for open, axial, and selective coding |
Grounded theory analysis of focus group transcripts; inductive coding taxonomy development via single sequence of coding, validation, and consensus; taxonomy fitted to SEIPS model and used for open, axial, and selective coding |
|
|
|||
|
aSystems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety |
|||
|
Hysong et al. Implementation Science 2009 4:62 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-62 |
|||