Table 3 |
||||
|
Rank changes* with adjustment among the top ten and bottom ten performers among 66 VA medical centers |
||||
| Adjusted rank |
||||
|
|
||||
| 8.0% |
8.5% |
9.0% |
9.5% |
|
|
|
||||
| Top ten performers, unadjusted rank |
||||
| 1 |
30 |
7 |
3 |
29 |
| 2 |
11 |
33 |
31 |
20 |
| 3 |
40 |
40 |
30 |
11 |
| 4 |
56 |
34 |
48 |
3 |
| 5 |
36 |
56 |
9 |
56 |
| 6 |
29 |
17 |
35 |
38 |
| 7 |
39 |
23 |
28 |
46 |
| 8 |
51 |
42 |
50 |
33 |
| 9 |
22 |
41 |
32 |
37 |
| 10 |
37 |
48 |
43 |
28 |
| Number among top ten performers, unadjusted, who would be ranked as top ten performers
with adjustment |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
||||
| Bottom ten performers, unadjusted rank |
||||
| 57 |
50 |
58 |
5 |
34 |
| 58 |
4 |
50 |
12 |
21 |
| 59 |
3 |
60 |
57 |
60 |
| 60 |
58 |
51 |
59 |
10 |
| 61 |
52 |
53 |
53 |
5 |
| 62 |
57 |
3 |
56 |
55 |
| 63 |
8 |
55 |
4 |
2 |
| 64 |
20 |
16 |
23 |
26 |
| 65 |
38 |
6 |
44 |
27 |
| 66 |
54 |
49 |
6 |
44 |
| Number among bottom ten performers, unadjusted, who would be ranked as top ten performers with adjustment |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
||||
|
*Emboldened numbers indicate adjusted ranks in the top ten. |
||||
|
Safford et al. Implementation Science 2009 4:2 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-2 |
||||