Table 4 |
|
|
Comments subtracted using the metaplan technique from group discussions of GPs. |
|
|
Topic |
Comments of GPs |
|
|
|
|
Guideline in general |
■ Patients need to be taken serious ■ Guideline downplays patients' pain |
|
Communication |
■ Difficulties conveying the non-biomechanic diagnosis ■ Mentioning the guideline approved by university increases credibility ■ Difficulties "selling" psychotherapy for LBP |
|
Physical activity |
■ Is easier to promote in younger people ■ Is mainly attractive for women ■ It is hard to motivate elder man ■ It is hard to motivate and give reasons for physical activity to physically hard working patients |
|
Physiotherapy |
■ Patient are highly satisfied with physical therapy ■ Knowledge deficits about what physical therapist can do ■ Suspicion that PT change prescription for physical therapy into massage |
|
Imaging |
■ General agreement on its low impact on patient care and therapeutic decisions ■ Patients want imaging ■ Increases prestige of the condition ■ Refusal of imaging could be perceived as cost-saving measure ■ Postponing imaging requires more counselling time |
|
Cooperation with orthopaedic surgeons |
■ Orthopaedic surgeons are (ab)used to get rid of difficult patients. ■ Fear of being blamed of missing something albeit not important ■ Troubles with access for patients with suspicion of serious complication or severe pain ■ Routine imaging and routine prescription of physiotherapy by orthopaedic surgeons make GPs appear as "poor man's choice" |
|
Injections |
■ Injections are popular particular among elder patients ■ Replacement of injections with non-steroidals by injections of local anaesthetics |
|
Patient education |
■ There should be public education on the radio and on tv about the ineffectiveness of bed rest, imaging etc. |
|
|
|
|
Chenot et al. Implementation Science 2008 3:7 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-7 |
|