|
Summary of data reported for integrating theory (proposition one) |
||
| Operational Definition |
Information Reported on Propositions |
Illustrative Examples |
|
|
||
| Proposition one: Integration of relevant theories |
||
|
|
||
| Descriptions of theories, including any references regarding the relationships among the specific mid-range theories for the various dimensions of Multiple Intervention Programs including: the targets of change, channels, settings, and intervention strategies |
A 'shopping list' of theories was reported |
The 'program operated at the individual, group and community levels and encompassed a wide range of strategies stimulated by social learning theory, persuasive communications theory and models for the involvement of community leaders and institutions' [35:p.203] |
| Most often, use of isolated theories was described for specific intervention design features |
'The innovation of diffusion theory provided a central framework for the project team... the role of the project as a change agent was to promote the diffusion of the lifestyle innovations of quitting smoking and adopting low fat diets' [30: p.42] Organizational change theory was directed at improving the 'macro environment' while influencing individuals 'choices and opportunities to change' [38: p.8] |
|
| Some reporting about the relationships among theoretical concepts through use of planning tool, such as a logic model |
'The approaches described above are unified...to depict the behavioural/social model of community intervention found to be most relevant' [30: p.43] |
|
Riley et al. Implementation Science 2008 3:27 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-27 |
||