Implementation Science Volume 2
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 DebateA conceptual framework for implementation fidelityChristopher Carroll1 , Malcolm Patterson2 , Stephen Wood2 , Andrew Booth1 , Jo Rick2 and Shashi Balain2  1School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK 2Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK author email corresponding author email
Implementation Science 2007,
2:40doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
|
|
| Published: |
30 November 2007 |
Abstract
Background
Implementation fidelity refers to the degree to which an intervention or programme is delivered as intended. Only by understanding and measuring whether an intervention has been implemented with fidelity can researchers and practitioners gain a better understanding of how and why an intervention works, and the extent to which outcomes can be improved.
Discussion
The authors undertook a critical review of existing conceptualisations of implementation fidelity and developed a new conceptual framework for understanding and measuring the process. The resulting theoretical framework requires testing by empirical research.
Summary
Implementation fidelity is an important source of variation affecting the credibility and utility of research. The conceptual framework presented here offers a means for measuring this variable and understanding its place in the process of intervention implementation. |