Study protocol
Improving quality of care through routine, successful implementation of evidence-based practice at the bedside: an organizational case study protocol using the Pettigrew and Whipp model of strategic change
-
* Corresponding author: Cheryl B Stetler cheryl.stetler@comcast.net
1 Health Services Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; (office) 321 Middle St., Amherst, MA 01002, USA
2 McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, CA
3 Centre for Health-Related Research, University of Wales, Bangor, UK
4 Center for Advancement of Evidence-based Practice, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
5 Veterans Administration HSR&D Center for Organization, Leadership & Management Research, Boston, MA, USA; Program on Health Policy & Management, Health Services Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
Implementation Science 2007, 2:3 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-3
Published: 31 January 2007Abstract
Background
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an expected approach to improving the quality of patient care and service delivery in health care systems internationally that is yet to be realized. Given the current evidence-practice gap, numerous authors describe barriers to achieving EBP. One recurrently identified barrier is the setting or context of practice, which is likewise cited as a potential part of the solution to the gap. The purpose of this study is to identify key contextual elements and related strategic processes in organizations that find and use evidence at multiple levels, in an ongoing, integrated fashion, in contrast to those that do not.
Methods
The core theoretical framework for this multi-method explanatory case study is Pettigrew and Whipp's Content, Context, and Process model of strategic change. This framework focuses data collection on three entities: the Why of strategic change, the What of strategic change, and the How of strategic change, in this case related to implementation and normalization of EBP. The data collection plan, designed to capture relevant organizational context and related outcomes, focuses on eight interrelated factors said to characterize a receptive context. Selective, purposive sampling will provide contrasting results between two cases (departments of nursing) and three embedded units in each. Data collection methods will include quantitative tools (e.g., regarding culture) and qualitative approaches including focus groups, interviews, and documents review (e.g., regarding integration and “success”) relevant to the EBP initiative.
Discussion
This study should provide information regarding contextual elements and related strategic processes key to successful implementation and sustainability of EBP, specifically in terms of a pervasive pattern in an acute care hospital-based health care setting. Additionally, this study will identify key contextual elements that differentiate successful implementation and sustainability of EBP efforts, both within varying levels of a hospital-based clinical setting and across similar hospital settings interested in EBP.