Table 3 |
|||||||||||
|
Methodological quality of included studies |
|||||||||||
| CBA Methodological Quality Assessment Results and Rating |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| First Author |
Unit of Allocation |
Unit of Analysis |
Power Calculation |
Baseline Measure |
Characteristics of Control |
Blinded Outcome Assessment |
Protection Against Contamination |
Reliable Outcomes Measure |
Provider Follow |
Patient Follow Up |
Rating |
|
|
|||||||||||
| Tsa i [27] |
Provider |
Provide r |
NC |
√ |
√ |
X |
NC |
X |
√ |
n/a |
Low |
|
|
|||||||||||
| RCT Methodological Quality Assessment Results and Rating |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| First Author |
Unit of Allocation |
Unit of Analysis |
Power Calculation |
Baseline Measure |
Allocation Concealment |
Blinded Outcome Assessment |
Protection Against Contamination |
Reliable Outcomes Measure |
Provider Follow Up |
Patient Follow Up |
Rating |
|
|
|||||||||||
| Dufault [24] |
Ward |
Provider * |
NC |
X |
NC |
X |
√ |
X |
NC |
n/a |
Low |
| Hong [25] |
Ward |
Provider * |
NC |
√ |
√ |
X |
√ |
X & NC |
NC |
n/a |
Low |
| Tranme r [26] |
Ward |
Provider * |
NC |
X |
NC |
X |
√ |
X |
NC |
n/a |
Low |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
√:Done X: Not Done NC: Not Clear * Unit of analysis error 4/8 or less – low quality 5/8–6/8 – medium quality 7/8 or higher – high quality |
|||||||||||
|
Thompson et al. Implementation Science 2007 2:15 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-15 |
|||||||||||