|
Number of participants by facility and hierarchical level |
||||||
| Facility |
Hierarchical Level |
Total # of Participants |
Total # of Interviews |
|||
|
|
||||||
| Primary Care Personnel |
Middle/Support Management |
Facility Leadership |
||||
|
|
||||||
| High Performers |
1 |
14 |
2 |
3 |
19 |
8 |
| 2 |
6 |
10 |
7 |
23 |
14 |
|
| 3 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
14 |
9 |
|
|
|
||||||
| Low Performers |
4 |
4 |
8 |
4 |
16 |
8 |
| 5 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
11 |
7 |
|
| 6 |
7 |
10 |
2 |
19 |
8 |
|
|
|
||||||
| Total |
41 |
38 |
23 |
102 |
54 |
|
|
Note: Facilities are listed in decreasing order of performance. No significant differences in the distributions of participants were found by facility or hierarchical level (χ210 = 17.4, n.s.). | ||||||
Hysong et al. Implementation Science 2006 1:9 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-9 |
||||||