Table 2 |
|||||||
|
Pharmacists' perception of outreach visit with physicians |
|||||||
| 1 Very negative n (%) |
2 Negative n (%) |
3 Neutral n (%) |
4 Positive n (%) |
5 Very positive n (%) |
Do not know n (%) |
Mean score |
|
|
|
|||||||
| What was their attitude toward using the software? |
0 |
0 |
3 (5) |
25 (38) |
38 (58) |
0 |
4.5 |
| What was their attitude toward printing out patient information? |
0 |
0 |
28 (42) |
29 (44) |
7 (11) |
2 (3) |
3.7 |
| How did they respond to receiving the full version of the guidelines? |
0 |
0 |
12 (18) |
43 (65) |
11 (17) |
0 |
4.0 |
| How did they respond to receiving the short-version of the guidelines? |
0 |
0 |
9 (14) |
44 (67) |
13 (20) |
0 |
4.1 |
| To what extent were they interested in the topic? |
0 |
0 |
4 (6) |
23 (35) |
39 (59) |
0 |
4.5 |
| What was their attitude toward you? |
0 |
0 |
1 (2) |
47 (71) |
17 (26) |
1 (2) |
4.2 |
| What was their attitude to the use of cardiovascular risk assessment? |
0 |
1 (2) |
0 |
17 (26) |
47 (71) |
1 (2) |
4.7 |
| What was their attitude toward the recommendation of thiazides as first-choice drug? |
1 (2) |
10 (15) |
24 (37) |
28 (43) |
2 (3) |
0 |
3.3 |
| What was their attitude toward the treatment goals? |
0 |
2 (3) |
8 (12) |
42 (65) |
10 (15) |
3 (5) |
4.0 |
| How do you rate your own performance during the presentation? |
0 |
1 (2) |
7 (11) |
55 (85) |
1 (2) |
1 (2) |
3.9 |
Fretheim et al. Implementation Science 2006 1:19 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-19 |
|||||||
