Table 2 |
|
|
Conditions for telehealth implementation |
|
|
Dimension |
Condition (Frequency)* |
|
|
|
|
Individual |
Perceived ease of use (4 md, 3 hm) Technology integrated to the daily practice (3 md, 2 hm) Healthcare professionals' motivation (2 md, 1 hm) |
|
Professional |
System based on the needs of health care professionals (4 md, 3 hm) Adequate remuneration for professionals in both sites (6 md, 1 hm) Defining clear rules for professional liability (3 md, 2 hm) Participation of physicians in telehealth decision-making (3md) |
|
Organisational |
Availability of resources dedicated to telehealth (specialised nurses, technicians, etc) (5 md, 4 hm) Specific schedules for telehealth consultations (3 md, 6 hm) Referrals based upon existing collaboration networks (3 md, 3 hm) Availability of up-to-date equipment (2 md, 3 hm) |
|
Socio-political/Systemic |
Massive investments in technologies and infrastructures (1 md, 4 hm) Regional agreements and local development plans for health care services delivery based upon a combination of local expertise, outreach services, and access to specialists with telehealth (1 md, 4 hm) |
|
Technological |
Reliable, mobile, ergonomic, and user-friendly systems (4 md, 5 hm) Image quality to allow diagnosis (4 md, 1 hm) |
|
Ethical/Legal |
Ensuring data confidentiality (2 md, 2 hm) |
|
|
|
|
* Number of physicians (md) and hospital managers (hm) who mentioned the condition. |
|
|
Gagnon et al. Implementation Science 2006 1:18 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-18 |
|