Table 1 |
||
|
Perceived telehealth benefits and limitations |
||
|
Dimension |
Perceived Benefits (Frequency)* |
Perceived Limitations (Frequency)* |
|
|
||
|
Clinical/Patient care |
Access to specialised services (5 md, 9 hm) Potential to save costs for patients (3 md, 4 hm) Facilitates management of transfers (4 md) Allows distant follow-up that improves continuity of care (3 md) Improves information circulation (3 md) |
Telehealth will never replace on site physician (6 md, 1 hm) |
|
Professional |
Access to a second opinion (10 md, 2 hm) Facilitates communication with peers (7 md, 3 hm) Diminishes the feeling of isolation (3 md, 2 hm) |
Anticipated changes in the definition of tasks and responsibilities (2 md, 2 hm) |
|
Educational |
Knowledge development and update (7 md, 2 hm) Increases access to CME (4 md, 4 hm) Multi-disciplinary/multi-centered exchanges (3 md) |
Teleeducation cannot substitute for all CME activities (2 md, 1 hm) |
|
Organisational/Systemic |
Supports the hospital as a regional reference centre (6 md, 5 hm) Ensures availability of services (4 md, 3 hm) Saves time and money for meetings (4 md, 3 hm) Potential to save costs for health system (3 md, 4 hm) Better organisation of on-call duties (4 md) |
Fear of replacing regional specialists (3 md, 2 hm) Heavy logistics needed in the two sites (2 md, 2 hm) Lack of commitment from the organisation (2 md, 1 hm) |
|
|
||
|
* Number of physicians (md) and hospital managers (hm) who mentioned the item. |
||
|
Gagnon et al. Implementation Science 2006 1:18 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-18 |
||