Table 3 |
|||||
|
Pre-Implementation Phase: Innovative Implementation Activities and Strategies for Project EBPs* |
|||||
| Innovations: Pre-Implementation |
ACT |
FPE |
IDDT |
IMR |
SE |
|
|
|||||
| State Infrastructure Building and Commitment |
|||||
| • Technical Assistance Center for state and Toolkit efforts established |
X |
||||
| • Participation in other demonstrations to ready state for EBPs |
X |
||||
| • Modifications to Toolkit made to fit state context of implementing EBPS |
X |
X |
|||
| • White Paper written by consumers to modify EBP |
X |
||||
| • State sponsored research establishing evidence base to implement EBPs |
X |
X |
|||
| Stakeholder Relationship Building and Communication |
|||||
| • State-wide meetings, workshops, conferences, technical assistance activities to
address philosophical and clinical practice differences between providers |
X |
X |
|||
| • Broad communication strategies established (e.g. educational forums, peer support
programs, statewide consumer and advocacy meetings) to discuss EBPs |
X |
X |
|||
| • State-wide meetings to engage consumers and other stakeholders in state and Toolkit
efforts |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
| • State-wide Advisory Group established |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
| • State-wide Advisory Committee established, integrating recovery perspectives |
X |
||||
| • Priority to include input and consumers on Advisory Board, Toolkit site Steering
Committees |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| • Reporting of current EBP successes in mass media |
X |
||||
| • Partnership formed between state and consumer community to train clinical staff |
X |
||||
| Financing |
|||||
| • Start-up incentive monies for sites provided by state |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| • Start-up incentive monies for sites provided by non-state funder |
X |
X |
|||
| • New use of block grant funds to support EBPs |
X |
X |
|||
| • Shift of funding from inpatient to community services by state |
X |
||||
| • Financial incentives, using Medicaid billing, for start-up year |
X |
||||
| • Approaches to make Medicaid billing easier for EBPs investigated by state |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| • Education and assurance about Medicaid billing procedures provided to sites by state |
X |
||||
| • White paper written by consumers to address Medicaid reimbursement and coding issues |
X |
||||
| • MOUs signed by community mental health centers to receive start-up funds |
X |
||||
| • State Vocational Rehab Agency established MOUs to solidify payment for services |
X |
||||
| Continuous Quality Management |
|||||
| • New licensing standards developed by non-state experts |
X |
||||
| • New licensing regulations developed or discussed |
X |
X |
X |
||
| • New dual certification and licensing standards established |
X |
||||
| • New standards for service delivery established |
X |
X |
|||
| • Association for Behavioral Health Centers formed to discuss reimbursement and administrative
rules and incentives for clinical staff to perform services |
X |
||||
| Service Delivery Practices and Training |
|||||
| • Training budget reallocated to be more effective for EBPS |
X |
X |
|||
| • Two-year training plan developed through community needs assessment process to deliver
training through regional training centers |
X |
||||
| • Tracks in clinical supervision and clinical administration best practices developed
by state |
X |
||||
| • Sites to receive incentives for additional training and technical assistance if
decide to implement EBP |
X |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
* EBPs: ACT = Assertive Community Treatment FPE = Family Psychoeducation IDDT = Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment IMR = Illness Management and Recovery SE = Supported Employment |
|||||
|
Magnabosco Implementation Science 2006 1:13 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-13 |
|||||